fbpx

IKEA refuses to join Bangladesh Accord

by | May 31, 2018 | Blog

For immediate release
Labour Behind the Label
1 June, 2018

Work to make Bangladeshi factories safe continues, but IKEA refuses to join

Today, 1 June, the 2018 Transition Accord will take effect, working to make garment factories in Bangladesh safer. It will continue the work of its predecessor, which was established shortly after the deadly Rana Plaza collapse in 2013, to inspect factories and monitor renovations in a credible and transparent way. The new Accord has a range of new features, including the fact that it now welcomes producers of home textiles and fabric and knit accessories, next to garment factories. This means that more companies can join and more workers can be protected. However, IKEA, the largest home furnishing company in the world, has refused to bring the home textile factories it sources from in Bangladesh under the purview of the Accord.    

The 2018 Transition Accord is now signed by 175 garment and home textile companies, including some of the main companies sourcing from Bangladesh such as Primark, H&M, C&A and Aldi. This covers more than 1,300 factories and approximately two million workers. As the initial Bangladesh Accord was signed by over 220 garment companies, it means that there are still many companies sourcing from Bangladesh that have refused to take responsibility for the safety of the workers producing their garments, including Abercrombie & Fitch, Sean John Apparel and Edinburgh Woollen Mill. Other garment companies have never even signed the first Accord, either creating their own, less credible and binding alternative or sticking to completely voluntary measures. These companies, which include VF Corporation (The North Face), GAP, Walmart and many others, should soon take responsibility for worker safety as well and join the Accord. Companies can and should still join after the start of the 2018 Accord, as it is never too late to start protecting workers’ lives.   

One of the new features of the 2018 Accord is that it also covers factories producing home textiles and fabric and knit accessories. In March therefore Future in Our Hands (FIOH), the organization that hosts Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC) in Norway, reached out to the country’s three main producers of home textile. While the two domestic companies Kid Interiør and Princess Gruppen answered favourably and signed the Accord, globally operating retail giant IKEA, originating from Sweden, refused to do so. 
 
In communication with representatives of FIOH and CCC Norway, IKEA claimed that the company’s own code of conduct, ‘the IKEA Way’ (IWAY), is sufficient to ensure safety at the company’s suppliers. In a meeting last Monday in Norway, IKEA reassured representatives of both organizations that there are several ways to reach the goal of factory safety. Clean Clothes Campaign is however convinced that there actually is only one credible way towards safe factories in Bangladesh – and it is not IKEA’s way. 

The Accord offers to only road towards safer factories in a country in which voluntary corporate social auditing systems has in the past failed to prevent the thousands of deaths of the Rana Plaza and Tazreen factory catastrophes. In response to that, the Accord is a collective scheme, that is a legally binding agreement between a great number of brands and trade unions and contains extensive enforcement mechanisms. IWAY is no different from previous voluntary corporate auditing schemes: it is IKEA’s code of conduct, which is accountable to only the company itself. It lacks the transparency that makes the Accord credible and accountable; while the Accord publishes inspection and progress reports as well as lists of factories that have been terminated from the programme, IKEA makes none of this information public. This makes it impossible for outsiders to check whether IWAY is actually making factories safer. Moreover, while the Accord inspects all factories that signatory companies source from or sourced from in the recent past, IKEA only carries out audits in its main suppliers, expecting them to in turn check on their subcontractors. This suggests that IKEA wants to deflect responsibility from these suppliers and strongly decreases their possibility to oversee the process and be knowledgeable about working conditions in those factories.  

IKEA claims to have has five main suppliers in Bangladesh. Research by FIOH reveals that only one of these suppliers in Bangladesh is covered by the Accord, meaning workers in the remaining factories are still at risk. 

Dominique Muller, Policy Director for Labour Behind the Label: ‘By continuing not to sign the Accord but instead to rely on coverage of the Accord for one key supplier, IKEA is freeloading from the efforts of the Accord while denying the workers at the other supplier factories the chance to have their workplaces monitored and improved. This is not fair play.” 

The Accord offers any company sourcing garment, home textile or fabric and knit accessories from Bangladesh an excellent opportunity to guarantee factory safety through a collective and transparent scheme that pools resources and has proven itself. 

Dominique Muller, Policy Director for Labour Behind the Label: “Ikea and another of company which has not yet signed up to the Accord are denying themselves and their customers an opportunity to make things safer for their workers. More importantly, they are putting the lives of their workers at risk.”
  
**********************

Background

Within three weeks after the Rana Plaza collapse a group of brands together with the Global Union Federations IndustriALL and UNI and eight Bangladeshi unions launched the Bangladesh Accord for Fire and Building Safety. While the programme started working from May 2013 on, apparel companies continued to sign on, and the signatory list eventually grew to over 220 corporate signatories. Key to its success are its enforcement system, which contains an escalation procedure for factories that fail to comply, and an arbitration process, that can be triggered by the worker representatives in the Accord against a company signatory. Two arbitration cases were settled at the end of 2017 and the beginning of 2018, the latter for an amount of 2.3 million USD.

The 2018 Accord is in several ways no exact duplicate of its predecessor. It not only has an extended scope but also expands its work on freedom of association and its training programme, now covering all factories and including freedom of association protections in relation to workers’ ability to stand up for their own safety. The 2018 Accord has a three-year term and is called the ‘Transition’ Accord as it is meant to facilitate the transition to a public regulatory regime in Bangladesh. The eventual transition will not mean that from that moment on all responsibility for worker safety in Bangladesh rests on the shoulders of the government alone. Both factories and companies continue to carry responsibility for their workers and supply chain and will need to be held responsible for safety in the workplace and remedy to workers that suffer workplace injury.

ENDS
Contact
Dominique Muller, Labour Behind the Label
Policy Director
dominique@labourbehindthelabel.org

Notes